CITES Compliance procedures

‘Compliance’ in the context of CITES means to act in accordance with and in fulfilment of the Convention’s requirements; it is the primary responsibility of the Parties and a core business of the Convention. Parties are required to have an administrative and regulatory system in place to ensure that the Convention achieves its objectives; failure to do so may result in becoming subject to one or more compliance measures, including trade suspensions. The cost of non-compliance can be high for the survival of entire species populations.
 
Click here to search for Parties subject to compliance procedures

CITES approach to compliance

CITES’ approach towards compliance matters is “supportive and non-adversarial” with the aim of ensuring long-term compliance. Resolution Conf. 14.3 (Rev. CoP18) contains, in its Annex, a Guide to CITES compliance procedures to assist CITES bodies in dealing with compliance matters. There are four steps for handling compliance matters in a diligent manner:
a) identification of potential compliance matters;
b) consideration of compliance matters;
c) measures to achieve compliance; and
d) monitoring and implementation of such measures and reporting.

Compliance Assistance Programme

At CoP18, the Parties established a new Compliance Assistance Programme (CAP) aimed at providing targeted support to Parties facing persistent compliance challenges. If a Party is facing compliance challenges, it is invited to approach the CITES Secretariat for advice and guidance.

More information about the CAP available here.

Search for Parties subject to compliance procedures

CITES Parties may be subject to one or more compliance processes. To see which Parties are currently subject to a specific compliance process, or a combination of compliance processes, please tick the relevant boxes below.

For more details about the compliance status of an individual Party, please refer to the country profile of that Party.

There are 80 Parties matching the criteria.
Party National Laws
Afghanistan Category 3
Algeria Category 2
Antigua and Barbuda Category 2
Armenia Category 3
Azerbaijan Category 2
Bahrain Category 3
Bangladesh Category 2
Belarus Category 2
Belize Category 3
Benin Category 2
Bhutan Category 3
Bosnia and Herzegovina Category 2
Botswana Category 2
Burkina Faso Category 2
Burundi Category 2
Cabo Verde Category 3
Central African Republic Category 3
Chad Category 2
Comoros Category 3
Congo Category 2
Côte d'Ivoire Category 3
Djibouti Category 3
Dominica Category 3
Ecuador Category 2
Eritrea Category 2
Gabon Category 2
Gambia Category 2
Ghana Category 3
Grenada Category 3
Guinea Category 2
India Category 2
Iraq Category 3
Kazakhstan Category 2
Kenya Category 2
Kyrgyzstan Category 2
Lao People's Democratic Republic Category 3
Lebanon Category 3
Lesotho Category 3
Liberia Category 3
Libya Category 3
Maldives Category 3
Mali Category 2
Mongolia Category 2
Montenegro Category 2
Mozambique Category 2
Myanmar Category 2
Nepal Category 2
Niger Category 2
Oman Category 3
Pakistan Category 2
Palau Category 3
Philippines Category 2
Rwanda Category 3
Saint Lucia Category 2
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Category 2
Samoa Category 3
Sao Tome and Principe Category 3
Seychelles Category 2
Sierra Leone Category 3
Somalia Category 3
Sri Lanka Category 3
Sudan Category 2
Suriname Category 2
Eswatini Category 3
Syrian Arab Republic Category 3
Togo Category 2
Trinidad and Tobago Category 2
Tunisia Category 2
Uganda Category 2
Uzbekistan Category 2
Zambia Category 2
North Macedonia Category 2
United Republic of Tanzania Category 2
Bermuda Category 2
Greenland Category 2
Macao, China Category 2
Montserrat Category 2
Saint Helena, Ascension Island and Tristan da Cunha Category 2
British Virgin Islands Category 2
Wallis and Futuna Islands Category 2
Generated on 30 Jan 2023 15:26

Identification of CITES compliance matters

Many compliance matters are identified through monitoring processes established by Resolutions, adopted by the Conference of the Parties. Where a compliance matter is persistent, or a Party is subject to two or more of these processes, it may be handled under Article XIII of the Convention.

Article XIII processes

Triggering Article XIII is considered to be a serious indication of apparent systemic or structural problems with the implementation and enforcement of the Convention. An Article XIII process will often include an inquiry being carried out by the Secretariat in the country concerned, upon invitation from the Party, leading to detailed recommendations being made by the Secretariat on actions to be taken by the Party. Such recommendations will cover all issues relevant for the effective implementation of the Convention. A number of Parties have been or are subject to an Article XIII process. Parties currently subject to the Article XIII process are the following: the Democratic Republic of Congo, Guinea, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Madagascar and Nigeria.
 
For information about the identified compliance matters and the recommendations and compliance measures taken by the Standing Committee in each case, please see the documents of the Standing Committee.

Recommendations to suspend trade

In certain cases, the Standing Committee decides to recommend the suspension of commercial or all trade in specimens of one or more CITES-listed species with a Party that is considered to be in non-compliance, consistent with the Convention. Such a recommendation may be made in cases where a Party’s compliance matter is unresolved and persistent, and the Party is showing no or little intention to achieve compliance. A recommendation to suspend trade is always specifically and explicitly based on the Convention and on any applicable Resolutions of the Conference of the Parties as mentioned in the box on compliance processes above. 
Current recommendations to suspend trade may be found on the dedicated webpage.